[visit-developers] OpenGl driver compatibility?
brugger1 at llnl.gov
Thu Jul 2 14:44:07 EDT 2015
You need Mesa if you will be rending on a machine without a display. So if your remote server doesn't have any type of display then that may be your problem.
From: John Cary [mailto:cary at txcorp.com]
Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2015 10:19 AM
To: visit-developers at elist.ornl.gov
Subject: Re: [visit-developers] OpenGl driver compatibility?
Actually, your builds work fine on other machines, but ours do not. We are not building with Mesa. So we are trying to figure out why our build of VisIt does not work while yours does.
What are the use cases for having Mesa? Does one need it for remoting?
Any other ideas on how this incompatibility arises?
On 7/2/2015 10:47 AM, Brugger, Eric wrote:
> I am assuming you are having problems with the Linux versions. For maximum compatibility you should use the pre-built versions without Mesa. For 2.9.2, the Ubuntu 11 version comes in 2 versions, with and without Mesa, the Ubuntu 14 version is without Mesa, and the rhel6 version is with Mesa. For future releases I will also generate 2 versions for the thel6 version, one with Mesa, one without.
> -----Original Message-----
> From: John Cary [mailto:cary at txcorp.com]
> Sent: Thursday, July 02, 2015 9:20 AM
> To: VisIt Developers
> Subject: [visit-developers] OpenGl driver compatibility?
> We are building and distributing embedded visit, and many times the recipient is unable to run it. It crashes in the driver.
> For the visit executables you distribute, do you build against some driver that guarantees compatibility?
More information about the visit-developers