[visit-developers] [visit-commits] Update to SVN (7217)

Brad Whitlock whitlock2 at llnl.gov
Wed May 6 17:53:53 EDT 2009


We can probably keep the current compositor on Windows since it would 
only be used for SR from multiple engines since there's no parallel 
engine on Windows yet.

Brad


>Is Ice-T applicable on windows platform?  (pardon my ignorance)
>Are you thinking for 1.12 or 2.0?
>
>Kathleen
>
>On Wed, 2009-05-06 at 14:20 -0700, Hank Childs wrote:
>>  VisIt-dev List,
>>
>>  I think we need to raise the topic of making Ice-T be our default 
>>  compositor.  I can envision that we use Ice-T whenever possible and 
>>  fall back to the old compositor with transparent geometry.  (Tom 
>>  needs to tell us if this is possible.)  I could also envision that 
>>  someone clever could make Ice-T work with transparent geometry, since 
>>  we are basically doing our own "tiling" at that point, and it might 
>>  just be a matter of communicating our tiling to Ice-T.  (I'm sure I'm 
>>  dramatically oversimplifying.)
>>
>>  I saw a factor of 8.5X performance difference.
>>
>>  -Hank
>>
>>  On May 6, 2009, at 2:15 PM, Hank Childs wrote:
>>
>>  >
>>  > Hello VisIt,
>>  >
>>  > I fixed a couple of problems with getting Ice-T to work on TACC's 
>>  > ranger machine.  (Both my mistakes, not build_visit's or Ice-T's)
>>  >
>>  > M  config-site/spur.tacc.utexas.edu.conf
>>


-- 
======================================================================
Brad Whitlock                   Lawrence Livermore National Laboratory
whitlock2 at llnl.gov
(925)424-2614
======================================================================


More information about the visit-developers mailing list